Showing posts with label January 2017. Show all posts
Showing posts with label January 2017. Show all posts

Monday, 6 February 2017

The titles used by the Cholas; An Examination (Part-I)

While researching for the three articles that I wrote (1, 2, and 3 respectively), I came across the interesting titles the Chola Kings used - which to an extent, serves as witness to their achievements- military & otherwise. Another problem I encountered is with Western Historiography - the use of the "Royal Noble and chivalric titles" as used by Western Scholars cannot be equated to the titles used during medieval/late antiquity periods in European History. What title can you give to, for example, the Zamorin or the Perumal? Are they "Kings?" or "Petty Kings"? Or are they something else entirely? (More on the Problem of Western Historiography in a later article)
So what I'm attempting to do here is not only to provide a window to Chola History, but also [attempt] to provide a ready reckoner for the Chola Emperors ( I'm only examining the titles used by the Medevial Cholas, as even this seems to be a gargantuan task for me. See Note 1 as well)
Below is the list of  the Chola Emperors & their titles, till Rajaraja Chola the Great. 
Vijayalaya Chola (848 C.E. to 871 C.E.)
After the fall of the ancient Chola Kingdom, it is not known what happened in the interregnum; from almost 200 C.E. to 848 C.E., it is a dark time for the Cholas, thus, historians have used the accounts of the Pandyas and Pallavas, and it is supposed that they ruled the Kaveri heartland as tributaries/feudatories of the the Pandyas/Pallavas.
Vijayala Chola conquered Thanjavur from Elango Mutharaiyar who was the final ruler of Mutharaiyar dynasty. It is said that in the year 852 CE Vijayalaya Chola waged war with the Muttaraiyar king Sattan Paliyilli (826–852 CE) in the neighbouring east, and captured his territory of Thanjavur. While Vijayalaya Chola was a Pallava feudatory, the Muttaraiyan chief was a Pandya feudatory. Making use of the opportunity during a war between Pandyas and Pallavas, Vijayalaya rose out of obscurity and captured Thanjavur. 
He used the title  Parakesarivarman, a title meant in part to honour his ancestor, Parakesari. Inscriptions under his son exclusively refer him by this name. 
Aditya Chola I (871 C.E. to 907 C.E.)
It was under him that the Cholas overthrew the Pallava yoke and achieved independence. He used the title Rajakesari as his primary title, In Inscriptions, he is also called "Tondainadu pavina Rajakesarivarman", "The Rajakesarivarman who overran Tondainadu" Tondainadu, as those ardent fans of Crusader Kings 2 would note, Is the North-Eastern region of Tamil Nadu (see note 2)
The inscirption of his successor, his son, notes him as Thondaimaanaruur thunjina udaiyaar (The King who died at Tondaimanarrur), Tondaimanarrur being the Capital of Tondai nadu. It is thought to be near Sriklahasti, in Chittor, Andhra Pradesh. 
Parantaka Chola I (907 C.E. to 955 C.E.)
As his Grandfather, Parantaka Chola I held the title "Parakesari". As early as his Third Regnal year, he is beleived to have invaded and occupied the Capital of the Pandyas, having been given the title "Maduraikondan",and later is described as "Madhurantaka",the destroyer of Madurai - This is after he conducted a successful raid on the Pandya Capital.
After defeating an alliance of the Pandya & Ceylon kings, and after further conducting raid on Lanka, he is described as " Maduraiyum Elamum Konda Parakesarivarman" – Parakesarivarman who conquered Madurai and Sri Lanka. He utilized his war loot to cover the roof of the celebrated Shiva Temple at Chidambaram to be covered with Gold, for this he is described as "Thillaiyambalathhukku pon koorai veiyntha thevan". See Note 3 as well.
Gandaraditya 
The reccords of the next 30 years of the Cholas are scant; and thus what we know of it is rather skewed ( Reasons noted in Note 4). However, we can reasonably conclude that Gandaraditya used the title : "Rajakesari"  as well as "Merkey elundarulina devar" - "the king/lord who was pleased to go west"- for He apparently went to Kerala.
Arinjaya 
It is not known for a certainty whether Arinjaya, the third son of Parantaka Chola I ruled, historians assume that he ruled for a short period, in all probability, as an intermediary between his nephew, Uttama Chola I. Arinjaya is described as  "Alvar Arikulakesarideva" Rajaraja Chola I, his Grandson. For the Purposes of Clearly understanding the succession of Kings, see Note 5.
Sundara Chola (Parantaka Chola II)
He is credited with laying the foundations of the success his younger son Rajaraja Chola I- he defeated the Pandyas, and assumed the title of Maduraikonatan,  as his Grandfather, Parantaka Chola did. He and his son, Aditya Chola II, defeated and routed the Rashtraukatas from Tondainadu. His heir and Co-regent, Aditya Chola II Karikalan was assassinated, (which remains an unsolved mystery), and Sundara Chola is remarked to have died of a broken heart - given the title  "Pon maligai thunjina thevar" – "the king who died in the golden palace".
Aditya Chola II
Aditya Chola was co-regent and firstborn son of Sundara Chola, and was co-regent as well. He is remarked to have fought valiantly at Chevur, having, at the age of 12, "played with Veera Pandyan", the title given to him is"Vira Pandyan Thalai Konda Adithha Karikalan" - "The Adithya Karikalan who took the head of Vira Pandayan": Historians state that this does not literally mean he cut the king to size, but rather that he humiliated the King at the battlefield. He is also described as a "Vira Abhimanyu": A brave Abhimanyu, the famous warrior son of Arjun of Mahabharta. (The calligrapher uses a tecchnique which is rather ingenious: Abhimanyu, of course, was a ferocious warrior, who died as he could not escape the Chakravyuha; and he died. Here, Aditya Chola was a ferocious warrior, but his death came in the fame of the Chakravyuaha that was his assassination.)
Uttama Chola
Uttama Chola, the son of Gandaraditya, succeeded Sundara Chola upon his death. Sundara Chola's second son, Rajaraja Chola, was installed as his heir as compensation for being passed over. Uttama is described as Parakesari.  He also assumed to have the title "Vikrama".
Rajaraja Chola I "The Great"
Rajarja as I noted here, is one of the greatest Emperors of Indian History. His name is recorded at birth as "Arulmozhi Varman". He is said to have been elected by a democratic process, having served as heir-presumptive as "Yuva-raja" . He first attacked the Cheras at Kanathaur Salai, having used  the title "Kandalur -salaik-kalamautta", and "having beheaded the Malai Alargal", Malai Alargal being the Chera Warriors who must have defended Kandalur from the Chola attack ( For a more detailed understanding of the Kandalur War, see Note 6) . He also uses the title "Mummadi Chola-deva" which is thought to be "The Chola who had strength thrice over". He of course, took the title "Rajakesari"as his predecessors had.
After conquering/subjugating the Pandyas and the Cheras, he is called the "Mummudi Cholan" literally, the Suzerain of the 3 kingdoms: Chola, Chera and Pandya.
Rajaraja, by virtue of his tremendous success, is called a variety of titles in inscriptions.
He is also called "Keralantaka" for having subjugated the Cheras, and this Gopura is the Keralanthaka Gopura Constructed in front of the Brihadeeswarar temple:
the Keralantka Gopura
The other titles used by him are listed and its translations are listed in Table 1.


Sunday, 22 January 2017

The Legacy of Barack Obama

As 8 years of the Obama Presidency comes to close, I look at his legacy, and what he leaves for Trump & the world at the large.
shutterstock_9258895-630x421
What is Obama's legacy?  When he became President 8 years ago,  he was elected on the idea of "Hope". How has this transformed in his Presidency?  And what is the legacy he leaves behind? 
Is it Obamacare, the first National healthcare plan in the US? Is it the Legalization and support for Same-Sex marriage?
or is it the continued fracture of American Politics, ending in the election of Trump? or Syria & Ukraine going to hell?
Inevitably,  both 'good' and 'bad' are part of his legacy. Obama's presidency rapidly transformed American society into a progressive one, yet with inevitable faults. While many gasped for a Post-Racial America, that dream is all but dead now. Not only has continued instances of Black Unarmed civilians being shot by Police officers bought into the forefront the implicit racism of law enforcement officers, but the response to the 'Black Lives Matter' Protesters, 'Blue Lives matter' shows the disconnect between the two major parties.
Race and racial issues- which by the 90s were no longer a source of conflict, have now become an issue again. The cultural wars, of course, are over, and the left has unequivocally triumphed. In my opinion, this is the most monumental achievement of the Obama Presidency: Marriage Equality & repeal of Don't Ask & Don't Tell. It would be most probably what his presidency would be remembered for in America. Other than being the first African American President.
In the international arena, Obama's strategic failure in the middle east cannot be discounted. and don't forget Russia. Obama's administration failed to counter Russia in Ukraine, and the humanitarian crisis in Syria. On the other hand, Positives include the Paris climate deal, but is on the way to being  gutted(maybe).  
Don't forget the drones. Some even argue this was his worst legacy. Relations with India, of course, improved, but it would have anyways; India enjoys huge bipartisan support.
What about Obamacare, you may ask? Is that not his greatest legacy? It could have been: Obama achieved what Clinton and Democratic Presidents could not before: a National healthcare plan. But it is needlessly complicated, as a result of Obama trying  to find a consensus  with the Republicans.   And its well on the way to being repealed.
Obama failed the  Democrats domestically, and there is no doubt about that. His failure to help his party in domestic elections has led the democrats to a minority in State Governorships, Legislatures, and didn't get a democratic house since  2008-10.  Obama might have led the economy out of the 2008 recession, but the economic fracture led, in some ways, for the Trump Vote.
Is he the most successful Democrat since FDR?. the most consequential Democrat, yes. His success is debatable. One most however not forget that he was a dignified man, a humane person, who strived to do right by him.
Obama leaves a fractured world order, a hyperpartisian domestic arena, and a weak democratic party, which will be unable to preserve his legacy, or take a meanigful stand in the House.
Extra Reading

Tuesday, 3 January 2017

Dhulgarh:The Great Deception

In a post on 31 December, blogger extraordinaire Arnab Ray noted that Media "[Do not report] anything that does not conform to their[media establishments] political narrative, of the fascism of the Hindu majoritarian rule in Delhi, no matter the human cost of what they choose to ignore."
The fact that most of us, constant news guzzling citizens are unaware of what happened in Dhulgarh is frightening: We know of the riot and the loss of life only due to the information spreading on Social Media. The Mainstream Establishments continue to gloss over the happenings in Dhulgrah almost 4 weeks after it occurred. This points to a political agenda to the Media that is pursuing.
If for a second imagine if these riots and attacks happened against Muslims in say, Madhya Pradesh. How would the media report it ? What would be the reaction of the great Rajdeep Sardesai, who tweeted with impunity:
dgd1
Little later did his own news channel, India Today report the incident, probably mindful of TRPs that its competitor, Zee news would have gained. Zee, of course, is associated closely with the BJP and had its own agenda in covering the incident. Regardless, not many have condemned the FIR filed against Zee for reporting on the incident, probably because principles in Media is a rare commodity nowadays. The Editors Guild, otherwise the first to condemn any perceived violation of Freedom of speech: FakingNews, a satire website published this report, which might seem to be a satirical piece, but seems to be the real situation in Indian Media.
The Press Council of India, too, has been rather conspicuously silent on it.
All this information, of course has been facilitated and has come out in the open only because of the media-neutral entity that the Internet is. I shudder to think if we had no such source, how would we have known of these incidents? what would become of those who lost their home & hearth because of this?
This is the Great Deception. While the mainstream English Language Media assume itself to be the center of the Universe, continues to drone over the effects of Demonetization & air incoherent discussions on it, the real, human cost of Dhulgarh is lost to us. The belief in Media, of course, is at an all time low, as demonstrated by the success of Donald Trump & Brexit in the Western World.
In Urban Upper Middle Class India, the same phenomenon has been replicating. The trust in the Media is declining because of self inflicted injuries more than anything.
Mamata Banerjee, the Chief Minsiter of West Bengal, when asked what happened in Dhulgarh replied: "Nothing".  From the Hon'ble Chief Minister,  though, its a classic answer.
All these incidents create the violent perception of the "tyranny of the Minority", which will of course, result in more liberal members of the majority community being swayed to the BJP (Eh!, no surprises there)
Ironically, the creation of this perception and the continued appeasment of the Minority community results in Hindutva politics raising its head in Bengal.
In conclusion, Kudos to the Internet!
And I sincerely hope the communal Tinderbox that is Bengal changes.
(Note of appreciation to Sitaram Yechury & CPM, who attempted to conduct their own enquiry, but was stopped by the Police.)